• Users Online: 170
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 163-168

Use of o-arm navigation to excise a posterior element osteoid osteoma

Department of Orthopedics, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication23-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pradhyumn P Rathi
Row House No. 1, Shamail Complex, Balaji Nagar, Bhayander West, Thane - 401 101, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/isj.isj_45_18

Rights and Permissions

There are only few reports of the advantages of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography based navigation system being used for spinal tumor excision. A 33 year old male presented in the clinic with mid-back ache with change in posture. Radiology suggested an osteoid osteoma involving the superior articular process of the D11 vertebra. Accurate localization and complete extirpation of the lesion were performed using a translaminar approach with O-arm Navigation. 3D navigation with the O-arm system provided an easy and accurate localization of the lesion, reducing the risk of instability subsequently and avoiding instrumented stabilization. This technique also provided for histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis.

Keywords: Computer navigation, excision, O-arm, osteoid osteoma, tumor

How to cite this article:
Rathi PP, Peshattiwar VB. Use of o-arm navigation to excise a posterior element osteoid osteoma. Indian Spine J 2019;2:163-8

How to cite this URL:
Rathi PP, Peshattiwar VB. Use of o-arm navigation to excise a posterior element osteoid osteoma. Indian Spine J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 28];2:163-8. Available from: https://www.isjonline.com/text.asp?2019/2/2/163/263279

  Introduction Top

Computer-assisted spinal surgeries were mainly restricted to pedicle screw placements. However, there were only few reports of the advantages of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system being used for spinal tumor excision.

  Case Report Top


A 33-year-old male presented in the clinic with mid-back ache for 7 months. It was a dull aching continuous pain radiating to the left side of the chest without any claudication, associated with change in posture with drooping of the shoulder to the left side, progressively increased to the point of causing difficulty in daily activities. Pain was aggravated at night and relieved by taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). The patient had no other comorbidities.

On clinical examination, he had dorsolumbar scoliosis with convexity to the right, tenderness, and paraspinal spasm in that region. The scoliosis was partially corrected on bending forward.

His back visual analog scale (VAS) score was 8 with Oswestry Disability Index 40%. No significant abnormality was detected on neurological examination.


Radiographs of the dorsolumbar spine suggested sclerosis in the D10 and D11 facet joint on the left side with scoliosis with convexity to the right [Figure 1].
Figure 1: X-ray full length showing the scoliosis with convexity to the right

Click here to view

Pre- and post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the dorsolumbar spine was performed. The dynamic evaluation was performed with contact using time-intensity curves and correlated with plain CT. There was a well-defined lytic lesion seen involving the superior articular process of the D11 vertebra measuring 11 mm × 11 mm × 9 mm being hypointense on T2 [Figure 2] and mildly hyperintense on T1 with central sclerosis on CT scan scalloping the inferior articular process of the D10 vertebra. It showed rapid early uptake of contrast on arterial phase with slow washout [Figure 3]. These findings favored a diagnosis of osteoid osteoma.
Figure 2: A well defined lytic lesion seen involving the superior articular process of the D11 vertebra measuring 11 mm × 11 mm × 9 mm being hypointense on T2

Click here to view
Figure 3: A rapid early uptake of contrast on arterial phase

Click here to view


The patient was positioned prone on the Trios Modular Spinal Surgery Table System with the Wilson Plus Radiolucent Frame (Mizuho OSI, Tokyo, Japan).

After taking safe surgical precautions, a single two-dimensional fluoroscopy image was taken from the O-arm (Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA) to mark the incision and a stab incision was made cranially to attach the reference probe to the spinous process, extending caudally to the dorsolumbar region.

Subsequent dissection was performed to reach the left D10 D11 facet joint. With the surgical site draped and the O-arm centered, the operating personnel was allowed to exit the operating room along with the anesthesiologist who induced an apnea. With O-arm setting changed to minimize the radiation dose, a CT scan was taken within 15 s. While the personnel entered the room, the O-arm reconstructed the data into 3D images.

The navigation system used was StealthStation S8 (Medtronic, TN, USA). The basic data used for navigation consisted of preoperative CT data, which were transferred and recorded on the system computer and reconstructed into three-dimensional (3D) images.

After registering the navigation, 1.5 mm ball-tipped reference probe, the accuracy of the images was verified by point merging and surface merging. The lesion was identified and accurately localized with the probe. Under neurosurgical microscope OPMI Pentero 900 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) careful drilling was initiated with 3-mm diamond tip MIDAS Navidrill (Medtronic, TN, USA) in the left D10 lamina till the lesion wall was reached as identified with the probe. The lesion was extirpated en masse from the D11 articular process. Further, drilling was done in the walls of the articular process taking care not to breach the pedicle and keeping the dura safe.

Adequacy of extirpation was checked using the Navigation probe [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7] and Video 1]. Surgical wound was closed. The patient walked 4 h after the surgery. In 2 days, the back VAS improved to 3, and he was discharged home.
Figure 4: Adequacy of superior extirpation was checked using the navigation probe

Click here to view
Figure 5: Adequacy of inferior extirpation was checked using the Navigation probe

Click here to view
Figure 6: Adequacy of lateral extirpation was checked using the navigation probe

Click here to view
Figure 7: Adequacy of medial extirpation was checked using the navigation probe

Click here to view


At 1 month after surgery, he did not complain of back pain or radiation, his ODI was 2%. His scoliosis had improved.

  Discussion Top

Osteoid osteoma, first described by Jaffe in 1935,[1] is a benign bone tumor involving the axial skeleton in 10% of patients[2] with 75% located in the posterior elements and 7% in the vertebral body.[3],[4] It is characterized by focal or radicular nocturnal pain typically relieved by NSAIDS and painful scoliosis. Plain radiograph may not be always confirmatory; however, triphasic scintigraphy and CT scan help make the radiological diagnosis of osteoid osteomas.[5],[6],[7]

Pathologically, it is characterized by the formation of a small nidus of variably calcified osteoid tissue in the stroma of loose vascular connective tissue, surrounded by a margin of dense sclerotic bone.[8]

Treatment of an osteoid osteoma involves complete intralesional excision of the nidus, either by surgical or radiological intervention. However, intra-operative localization of the nidus may be difficult and may involve extensive resection of the adjacent normal bone structure leading to possible risk of fracture and extended period of healing, instability requiring stabilization, or inadvertent neurovascular injury.

Techniques to improve the accuracy of intraoperative localization of the nidus include radionuclide localization with a gamma probe,[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] intraoperative CT-guided localization,[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] or a combination of scintigraphy and computer navigation.[19]

A scintillation gamma probe is used to detect the99 mTc-oxidronate concentrating nidus during surgery. However, wide surgical removal of the affected bone was recommended.[9],[10],[12],[13] which in spine, resulted in fusion after en bloc excision.[5],[12]

CT-guided percutaneous resection uses a drill inside a trocar for lesions in extremities and spine.[16],[18],[20],[21] However, the results were less successful in the spine. Assoun et al. treated 24 patients (23 in extremities and 1 in the spine) by percutaneous CT-guided resection with failure in the only patient with a spinal lesion. Twenty Sans et al. treated 38 patients, of which 2 (in spine) failed, requiring a secondary procedure.[21] Apart from a high failure rate, CT-guided percutaneous resection of osteoid osteomas in the spine has other limitations such as difficulty in accurately localizing the drill tip, because of the scattering of metal instruments, resulting in malpositioned and inadequate drilling with increased risk of accidental dural and spinal cord injury, increased risk of infection due to substandard sterility precautions in radiological suite. Infection occurred in two cases in the series by Sans et al.[21] Hence, Ozaki et al. and Assoun et al. concluded that percutaneous CT-guided resection of osteoid osteomas with spinal localization is not advisable.[20],[22]

CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation[14],[16],[18] first successfully reported by Osti and Sebben,[14] and laser photocoagulation[23] are minimally invasive procedures described for the treatment of osteoid osteomas located in the extremities and spine. Proximity to neural structures makes this modality conflicting. Samaha et al. in their three cases considered it to be an effective and safe modality to treat lesions adjacent to neural structures[24] However, heating the tip of a needle to 90°C for 4–6 min in a nidus situated adjacent to neural structures inevitably risks thermal damage to the neural structures.[25] Hadjipavlou et al. questioned its safety when the nidus is adjacent to the neural elements.[18] Vanderschueren et al. reported a recurrence in 2 of their 4 cases that had spinal osteoid osteomas.[17] Van Royen et al. (2 out of 5 were failures) concluded that this technique is not as reliable for spinal procedures as it is for extremities.[19] Risk of injury to adjacent neural structures, inconsistent results in the spine and lack of histologic confirmation of diagnosis do not make it the ideal procedure for treating osteoid osteomas in the spine.

The importance of obtaining tissue for histologic diagnosis is emphasized by Sans et al. where six cases had a histologically different diagnosis.[21]

Laser photocoagulation and radiofrequency ablation do not permit histologic confirmation, and the indications for their use should be carefully weighed.

Van Royen et al. used CT-based computer navigation system (Brain LAB) and radionuclide localization with a gamma probe to accurately localize the nidus with successful outcome in all 5 cases.[19] Intraoperatively, the authors found it difficult to identify and match the affected vertebral body preoperative CT scan, which was facilitated by the gamma probe.

Rajasekaran et al.[26] used a fluoroscopy-based computer navigation system (Siremobil Iso-C 3D–Vector vision) in four cases where fluoroscopic images acquired intraoperatively, were reformatted to give real-time multiplanar images to enable accurate localization of the lesions the spine. A repeat intraoperative scan after excision confirms the adequacy of excision.

Mori et al.[27] successfully treated their two cases of osteoid osteomas located adjacent to the facet joints by complete and pin-point removal of the nidus located close to the facet joint without excessive removal of the bone and possible damage of nearby neurovascular structures through navigation guidance by making a translaminar tunnel to reach the nidus using a high-speed drill.

Nagashima et al.[28] recently described a case with an osteoid osteoma of the C2 pedicle successfully treated by using a conventional CT-based navigation system, but with extensive exposure of the entire posterior compartment of the affected vertebra.

Campos et al.[29] used video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with 3D navigation for osteoid osteoma resection in a thoracic vertebra. The authors reported that the O-arm provided better localization for complete resection.

With intraoperative navigation systems, radiation exposure has been a significant shortcoming, especially in spinal surgeries. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screws insertion can be as high as 10 folds greater compared with radiation exposure during nonspinal procedures.[30] The radiation produced by one spin of the O-arm is comparable with the radiation produced by a CT scan or by the C-arm when used for a prolonged period.[31] Exposure from an intraoperative thoracic CT scan with the O-arm was less than the exposure from fluoroscopy when pedicle screws were inserted using the freehand technique.[32] The radiation dose with the O-arm depends on the machine protocol (KV and mAs) and the cumulative exposure dose will depend on the number of spins performed.[31]

Krokidis et al.[33] reported the successful use of a novel CT-based navigation system to accurately ablate with only minimal radiation exposure in a pediatric patient.

The effective dose to the patient can be reduced using collimation or by minimizing the parameters of the device, as demonstrated by Su et al.[34] who by changing the O-arm setting to pediatric protocol of 80 kV/80 mAs with no adjustment for level or weight, minimized the effective radiation dose to the patient (0.65 vs. 4.65 mSv in standard mode; P < 0.0001) using this device. These doses are absolutely consistent with the ICRP recommendation for occupational radiation exposure, which proposes a limit of 2 mSv per year.


A long-term follow-up is required to evaluate for recurrence. Case series with more number of patients is required to make this a standardized treatment for such lesions.

  Conclusion Top

3D navigation with the O-arm system provided an easy and accurate localization of the lesion, reducing the risk of iatrogenic instability and subsequent instrumented stabilization, thereby reducing the hospital stay and cost of treatment. A complete extirpation of the tumor mass by precise drilling under direct vision of the operating microscope reduced the risk of fracture, instability, or injury to the adjacent neural structure. A verification O-arm spin confirmed complete tumor excision and a low dose protocol of the O-arm significantly reduced the radiation exposure to the patient. This technique also provided for histopathological confirmation the diagnosis.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Jaffe HL. Osteoid-osteoma: a benign osteoblastic tumor composed of osteoid and atypical bone. Archives of Surgery. 1935;31(5):709-28.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW, Moser RP Jr. Osteoid osteoma. Radiographics 1991;11:671-96.  Back to cited text no. 2
Azouz EM, Kozlowski K, Marton D, Sprague P, Zerhouni A, Asselah F, et al. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine in children. Report of 22 cases with brief literature review. Pediatr Radiol 1986;16:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
Swank SM, Barnes RA. Osteoid osteoma in a vertebral body. Case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:602-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
Gamba JL, Martinez S, Apple J, Harrelson JM, Nunley JA. Computed tomography of axial skeletal osteoid osteomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:769-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
Bilchik T, Heyman S, Siegel A, Alavi A. Osteoid osteoma: The role of radionuclide bone imaging, conventional radiography and computed tomography in its management. J Nucl Med 1992;33:269-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
Frassica FJ, Waltrip RL, Sponseller PD, Ma LD, McCarthy EF Jr. Clinicopathologic features and treatment of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in children and adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:559-74.  Back to cited text no. 7
Katz K, Kornreich L, David R, Horev G, Soudry M. Osteoid osteoma: Resection with CT guidance. Isr Med Assoc J 2000;2:151-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
Rinsky LA, Goris M, Bleck EE, Halpern A, Hirshman P. Intraoperative skeletal scintigraphy for localization of osteoid-osteoma in the spine. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:143-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
Colton CL, Hardy JG. Evaluation of a sterilizable radiation probe as an aid to the surgical treatment of osteoid-osteoma. Technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1019-22.  Back to cited text no. 10
Kirchner B, Hillmann A, Lottes G, Sciuk J, Bartenstein P, Winkelmann W, et al. Intraoperative, probe-guided curettage of osteoid osteoma. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:609-13.  Back to cited text no. 11
Osebold WR, Lester EL, Hurley JH, Vincent RL. Intraoperative use of the mobile gamma camera in localizing and excising osteoid osteomas of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1816-28.  Back to cited text no. 12
Wioland M, Sergent-Alaoui A. Didactic review of 175 radionuclide-guided excisions of osteoid osteomas. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1003-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
Osti OL, Sebben R. High-frequency radio-wave ablation of osteoid osteoma in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 1998;7:422-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Wolfe MW, Jennings LC, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:815-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
Cové JA, Taminiau AH, Obermann WR, Vanderschueren GM. Osteoid osteoma of the spine treated with percutaneous computed tomography-guided thermocoagulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1283-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
Vanderschueren GM, Taminiau AH, Obermann WR, Bloem JL. Osteoid osteoma: Clinical results with thermocoagulation. Radiology 2002;224:82-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
Hadjipavlou AG, Lander PH, Marchesi D, Katonis PG, Gaitanis IN. Minimally invasive surgery for ablation of osteoid osteoma of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:E472-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
Van Royen BJ, Baayen JC, Pijpers R, Noske DP, Schakenraad D, Wuisman PI, et al. Osteoid osteoma of the spine: A novel technique using combined computer-assisted and gamma probe-guided high-speed intralesional drill excision. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:369-73.  Back to cited text no. 19
Assoun J, Railhac JJ, Bonnevialle P, Poey C, Salles de Gauzy J, Baunin C, et al. Osteoid osteoma: Percutaneous resection with CT guidance. Radiology 1993;188:541-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
Sans N, Galy-Fourcade D, Assoun J, Jarlaud T, Chiavassa H, Bonnevialle P, et al. Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous resection and follow-up in 38 patients. Radiology 1999;212:687-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
Ozaki T, Liljenqvist U, Hillmann A, Halm H, Lindner N, Gosheger G, et al. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine: Experiences with 22 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(397):394-402.  Back to cited text no. 22
Faraj A, Byrne P, Mehdian H. Osteoid osteoma of the lateral mass of C5. Should excision be combined with fusion? Eur Spine J 1998;7:242-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
Samaha EI, Ghanem IB, Moussa RF, Kharrat KE, Okais NM, Dagher FM, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma of the “Neural spinal ring”. Eur Spine J 2005;14:702-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Guth S, Vinclair L, Sibilia J, Mortazavi R, et al. Percutaneous laser photocoagulation of spinal osteoid osteomas under CT guidance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1955-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
Rajasekaran S, Kamath V, Shetty AP. Intraoperative iso-C three-dimensional navigation in excision of spinal osteoid osteomas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E25-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
Mori K, Neo M, Takemoto M, Nishizawa K, Imai S. Navigated pin-point approach to osteoid osteoma adjacent to the facet joint of spine. Asian Spine J 2016;10:158-63.  Back to cited text no. 27
Nagashima H, Nishi T, Yamane K, Tanida A. Case report: Osteoid osteoma of the C2 pedicle: Surgical technique using a navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:283-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
Campos WK, Gasbarrini A, Boriani S. Case report: Curetting osteoid osteoma of the spine using combined video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:680-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2637-45.  Back to cited text no. 30
Kadhim M, Binitie O, O'Toole P, Grigoriou E, De Mattos CB, Dormans JP, et al. Surgical resection of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. J Pediatr Orthop B 2017;26:362-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
Flynn JM, Sakai DS. Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: Advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring. Eur Spine J 2013;22 Suppl 2:S131-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
Krokidis M, Tappero C, Bogdanovic D, Ziebarth K, Stamm AC. Computed tomography guided navigation assisted percutaneous ablation of osteoid osteoma in a 7-year-old patient: The low dose approach. Skeletal Radiol 2017;46:989-93.  Back to cited text no. 33
Su AW, Luo TD, McIntosh AL, Schueler BA, Winkler JA, Stans AA, et al. Switching to a pediatric dose O-arm protocol in spine surgery significantly reduced patient radiation exposure. J Pediatr Orthop 2016;36:621-6.  Back to cited text no. 34


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]

This article has been cited by
1 En Bloc Resection of Cervical Spine Osteoid Osteoma With O-Arm–Assisted 3D Navigation
Shashank Chitta, Trevor L. Russo, Andrew J. Albert, Scott S. Russo, Jarrod J. MacFarlane, Tyler J. Janish
JBJS Case Connector. 2022; 12(3)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Case Report
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded287    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal